We agree that the data supporting the effectiveness of a cloth mask or face covering are very limited. If the data are limited, how can we say face coverings are likely not effective? Reasons have included: (1) we don’t truly know that cloth masks (face coverings) are not effective, since the data are so limited, (2) wearing a cloth mask or face covering is better than doing nothing, (3) the article is being used by individuals and groups to support non-mask wearing where mandated and (4) there are now many modeling studies suggesting that cloth masks or face coverings could be effective at flattening the curve and preventing many cases of infection. The authors and CIDRAP have received requests in recent weeks to remove this article from the CIDRAP website. Sietsema is also an expert on respiratory protection and an assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.Įditor’s Note: The authors added the following statement on Jul 16. Brosseau is a national expert on respiratory protection and infectious diseases and professor (retired), University of Illinois at Chicago.ĭr. “The role of the face shields in preventing transmission is not supported, and if transmission via the eyes is felt to be a significant factor, such as with health care workers and dentists and dental technicians, goggles might provide better protection than a face shield.Dr. “This simulation indicates that surgical masks worn by all are more likely to provide significant protection to uninfected participants in indoor conversations,” Dr. Small respiratory particles from a patient cough can remain airborne and spread widely through a room, leaving others vulnerable to infection through inhalation. Studies have also shown that breathing and talking can also expel droplets that contain the virus. They found no significant improvement when face shields were used in combination with surgical masks.Īs with many other respiratory infectious diseases, evidence suggests that SARS CoV-2, the virus that causes the infection, is transmitted when infected people expel virus-containing droplets by sneezing or coughing. When only a mask was used, the plates developed minimal bacterial colonies. When a face shield was used alone, the researchers found significant numbers of bacterial colonies developed on the agar plates. They measured the number of bacterial colonies on agar plates, testing the effectiveness of masks, face shields, and the two combined. Chopra and Hossein Salimnia, Ph.D., professor of Pathology, created an aerosol-generating device consisting of a nebulizer, oxygen tank and fan to simulate an infected human speaking to an uninfected human from a distance of 0.15 meters and 1.82 meters.
To test the effectiveness of masks combined with face shields, Dr. “This result reinforces the fact that a surgical mask serves as an effective intervention, providing protection from aerosol droplets that spread COVID-19.” “Surprisingly, when assessing the combined protection of surgical mask and face shield, the level of protection was not enhanced in comparison to using surgical masks alone,” said Teena Chopra, M.D., M.P.H., professor of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, for the Wayne State University School of Medicine, and lead author of the study. The use of surgical masks alone provide good protection, surpassing that offered by face shields alone, is reported in the study, “ A laboratory model demonstrating the protective effects of surgical masks, face shields, and a combination of both in a speaking simulation,” published in the American Journal of Infection Control. Studies conducted by Wayne State University School of Medicine physician-researchers indicate that the use of plastic face shields with surgical masks provides the best protection against COVID-19 infection, but combining the two made little difference over the use of masks alone.
0 kommentar(er)
