


Those documents impose four conditions on all user appeals: But the FOB's Charter and Bylaws don't give users carte blanche to get their cases on the docket.
#Facebook oversight board boarddoueklawfare update#
First, aggrieved Instagram or Facebook users can appeal to the Oversight Board to either reinstate a piece of content that either platform took down, or-as of an update on April 13, 2021-appeal to remove a piece of content that the platform allowed to remain posted. The Oversight Board’s caseload comes from two different streams. How does the Oversight Board pick its cases? Each Board member will serve fixed three-year terms, up to a maximum of two terms. The board will eventually grow to include approximately 40 members. The FOB includes a diverse range of members from around the world, with less than half of the board members hailing from the U.S., Canada, and Europe. In May 2020, Facebook appointed the first 20 members of the Oversight Board, including a range of legal professionals, journalists and human rights advocates. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit judge and Stanford constitutional law professor Michael McConnell Columbia constitutional law professor Jamal Greene Colombian attorney Catalina Botero Marino and former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt. The Facebook Oversight Board is currently co-chaired by: former U.S. The board unveiled the inaugural docket on Dec. The Oversight Board inched closer to operation when Facebook announced on May 6 the board’s inaugural slate of members. 2020, Facebook unveiled the Oversight Board’s bylaws, which spell out the procedural rules of the review board. 2019 and finalized that document nine months later.

The company rolled out a draft charter for the board in Jan. Zuckerberg followed this up seven months later and announced concrete plans for the board in Nov. 2018, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg hinted at his desire to establish “some sort of structure, almost like a Supreme Court” for Facebook. How has the Oversight Board evolved over time?īack in Apr. In other words, when the Oversight Board tells Facebook it has to reinstate a given piece of content, Facebook has committed to listening to that decision “unless doing so could violate the law.” But the platform has also endowed the Oversight Board with the power to make binding verdicts on individual moderation decisions. The Oversight Board can issue non-binding policy recommendations, which the platform doesn’t have to oblige, though it has said it “will respond constructively and in good faith to policy guidance put forth by the board.” Following a decision, Facebook has 30 days to issue a response explaining how the platform has considered the Oversight Board's recommendations and which, if any, they will move to implement. It’s a review board that the company assembled to take a look at “ the most consequential content decisions” made by Facebook and Instagram, which is also owned by Facebook. The board functions more or less like a court for Facebook. What exactly is the Facebook Oversight Board? If you're here to peruse the collection of documents related to the Oversight Board, you can scroll through the page or use the buttons in the menu below to navigate.
